179 questions
No questions match those filters.
A client asks you to make a deployed LLM "forget" a spe...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansThe naive answer — retrain from scratch without that document — is correct and also usually infeasible: a frontier pretraining run costs millions of dollars and weeks of compute, and “forget one document” requests can arrive continuously (GDPR right-to-erasure, a takedown notice, a leaked secret).
Machine unlearning tries to approximate the effect of exclusion without re-running the full training job, but every practical method runs into the same wall: a document’s influence on the final weights isn’t localized. Training is a long sequence of gradient updates where each step’s effect compounds with and blends into every later step, so by the end of training there is no clean subset of parameters that “belongs to” one document the way a row belongs to a database table you could just delete. Gradient-based unlearning methods (approximating the removal by applying a reverse-gradient update, or influence-function estimates of what the weights would look like without that example) are efficient but only approximate, and empirically they tend to either under-forget — the information resurfaces under a different phrasing or a jailbreak prompt, because it was never truly localized to begin with — or over-forget, measurably damaging unrelated capabilities because the same weights are shared across many facts and skills.
The honest answer to a client asking for this is to separate the concerns structurally instead of unlearning after the fact: keep sensitive or volatile facts in a retrieval datastore rather than baked into pretraining, so “forgetting” a document is a delete operation on an index, not a hopeless post-hoc surgery on a trained network. Unlearning research is real and improving, but as of today it should be pitched as a mitigation for a training-time mistake, not a designed-in compliance mechanism you can promise will work on demand.