179 questions
No questions match those filters.
INT8 weight-only, INT4 (GPTQ/AWQ), or activation quanti...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansThese aren’t points on one dial — they trade off differently. Weight-only INT8 is close to free: perplexity typically degrades under 1% and you get roughly 1.5-2x throughput from halved weight memory, so there’s rarely a reason not to take it by default. INT4 weight-only (GPTQ, AWQ) is more aggressive and starts to bite on reasoning-heavy tasks unless you quantize per-group rather than per-tensor — grouping in blocks of around 128 values keeps the quantization scale local enough to absorb outliers without needing a full-precision fallback.
Activation quantization (W8A8 or W4A8) is the real throughput unlock because it lets hardware use integer matrix-multiply units instead of dequantizing back to floating point, but it’s also the hardest to get right: activations carry per-channel outliers that blow up a naive quantization range, which is why techniques like SmoothQuant exist — they migrate the difficulty from activations into the weights by jointly rescaling both, since weights are far easier to quantize accurately than outlier-heavy activations. The practical decision order: take weight-only INT8 by default, move to INT4 with per-group scaling once memory is the binding constraint, and only take on activation quantization’s outlier-handling complexity when you specifically need the compute-bound throughput it unlocks and have budget to validate quality on your own tasks.