179 questions
No questions match those filters.
Beyond deduplication and filtering, how do teams actual...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansRaw web-crawl frequency is a poor proxy for how much a domain should influence training, because the internet’s natural distribution reflects what gets published, not what’s useful for the capabilities you actually want. A domain like math, code, or long-context data is often deliberately upsampled 5-20x relative to its natural frequency during a mid-training or annealing phase, even when it was already present at pre-training scale — the goal isn’t exposure, it’s concentrating gradient signal on a capability late enough in training that it sticks without being diluted by the much larger general-web volume around it. This is distinct from deduplication, which removes redundant content; mixing ratios are a deliberate weighting decision layered on top of an already-deduplicated pool.
In practice this shows up as a staged curriculum: a long stable-phase pre-training run on a broad, deduplicated mixture, followed by a shorter decay phase where the learning rate anneals toward zero while the data mixture shifts toward upsampled high-quality and domain-targeted sources — curated math and code, reference text, sometimes a light dose of instruction-formatted data. Getting the ratio wrong in either direction is costly: too little upsampling and the targeted capability stays weak; too much and the model overfits narrow domains at the expense of general competence.