179 questions
No questions match those filters.
When does Prompt Engineering stop being enough and you...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansPrompting stops scaling when you notice you’re re-explaining the same behavior in every call instead of it being learned once. The clearest signals are a system prompt that keeps growing past a few thousand tokens just to pin down formatting, output that’s still inconsistent despite strong instructions, or specific edge cases that keep breaking no matter how the wording is adjusted — those are all signs the model needs the behavior trained in rather than requested each time.
Latency is the other trigger: if the task needs sub-100ms responses, a long prompt is directly working against that goal, and fine-tuning a smaller model on the target behavior removes the prompt overhead entirely. None of this is worth doing without real data, though — a fine-tune needs on the order of a thousand-plus clean input-output examples to actually generalize.
An insurance company that had grown its prompt to 4,000 tokens just to force a consistent 12-field JSON output was paying real per-call cost for something a fine-tune solved outright: after training a small model on 2,000 example outputs, the prompt shrank to 200 tokens and the per-call cost dropped by roughly 40x. Run the math on prompt overhead before assuming fine-tuning is overkill — past a couple thousand tokens of pure instruction-following, it usually pays for itself within a few months.