179 questions
No questions match those filters.
Break down the difference between factuality and faithf...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansThese are two different failure modes that get lumped together under “hallucination.” A factuality hallucination is a claim that’s false relative to the real world — the model asserts something incorrect, independent of what it was shown. A faithfulness hallucination is a claim that isn’t supported by the context it was actually given, even if the claim happens to be true — the model ignored, contradicted, or went beyond its provided evidence.
RAG’s core mechanism — grounding generation in retrieved passages — directly targets factuality: give the model correct, relevant evidence and it has a much better chance of stating something true. But nothing about retrieval guarantees the model will actually use that evidence faithfully. A model can be handed a perfectly correct passage and still generate a claim that contradicts or ignores it, because faithfulness is a property of the generation step, not the retrieval step. That’s why serious RAG evaluation always measures groundedness/faithfulness separately from factual correctness — a system can improve on one axis while staying flat or even regressing on the other.