179 questions
No questions match those filters.
What can supervised fine-tuning (SFT) actually teach a...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansSFT trains a model on pairs of (instruction, ideal response), directly teaching it format, tone, and instruction-following behavior by demonstration — it’s very effective at closing the gap between a raw pre-trained model that just continues text and one that behaves like an assistant.
What it structurally can’t do well is teach preference — when two responses are both fluent, on-topic, and instruction-following, but one is subtly better (more helpful, more accurate, safer) than the other, SFT has no way to express that distinction, because it only ever trains on single positive examples, never a comparison between a better and worse option. A model can be extremely fluent and instruction-following after SFT while still not reliably picking the better of two plausible responses when it matters.
That’s precisely the gap preference-based post-training (RLHF, DPO, and their variants) is designed to close: training directly on comparisons between a preferred and a dispreferred response, so the model learns the relative quality signal that demonstration-only SFT data can never encode.