179 questions
No questions match those filters.
Autoregressive generation is coherent but has a structu...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansThe strength and the weakness of autoregressive generation come from the same property: each token is generated conditioned on everything generated before it. That’s what gives the output its coherence — every new token is consistent with the established context. But it also means there is no correction mechanism once a token is committed; the model can’t look ahead, notice a mistake it made three tokens ago, and revise it within the same pass. Whatever was generated becomes ground truth for every prediction that follows.
This creates a compounding failure mode sometimes called error accumulation or exposure bias: if the model produces a subtly wrong token early on — a wrong fact, an inconsistent entity, a broken logical step — every subsequent token is now conditioned on that error as if it were true, and the model has no way to distinguish “this is context I should trust” from “this is a mistake I made.” The deviation doesn’t stay local; it propagates forward and can be amplified as the model tries to stay locally coherent with its own earlier error.
Longer outputs simply give this failure mode more room to operate — more tokens generated means more opportunities for an early deviation, and each one has a longer downstream sequence left to corrupt. This is part of why techniques like self-consistency (sampling multiple independent chains and voting) and iterative critique/revision passes exist: they compensate for the fact that a single autoregressive pass has no built-in mechanism to catch and repair its own early mistakes.