How do you adjudicate the conflict between product's de...

Full automation risks shipping incorrect claims, while full manual review negates the efficiency gains of using an automated judge. A balanced approach leverages the judge where it is most reliable and uses human oversight for high-risk cases. Specifically, auto-ship ‘attributable’ claims, as ‘extrapolatory’ claims often trigger automated retrieval loops, but keep ‘contradictory’ claims in a human queue, as these are the most costly and least recoverable errors. Improving the input—such as using full documents instead of snippets—can further reduce error rates before finalizing the policy.