179 questions
No questions match those filters.
Your GAN-based image generator has started producing ne...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansIt helps to keep in mind that a GAN generator’s objective is never “match the true data distribution” directly — it’s “produce outputs the current discriminator can’t distinguish from real,” and those two things only converge to the same thing under an idealized equilibrium that real optimization rarely reaches exactly. Mode collapse is what happens when the generator satisfies the proxy objective (fool the discriminator) while badly failing the real one (represent the data distribution), and it’s a stable, self-reinforcing state because once the discriminator is fooled by a narrow set of outputs, there’s no gradient pressure pushing the generator to explore elsewhere.
Non-convergence is the flip side: instead of settling into any equilibrium, generator and discriminator chase each other’s updates indefinitely. This is why watching the adversarial loss in isolation is a poor training signal for either pathology — a flat, well-behaved- looking loss curve is fully compatible with mode collapse, and an oscillating one doesn’t tell you whether the model is actually getting better.
The practical fix is to stop relying on the adversarial loss as the sole health metric and to attack the instability at its source with architectural and optimization changes — Wasserstein loss and gradient penalty smooth the loss landscape so gradients stay informative even far from convergence, spectral normalization keeps the discriminator from becoming arbitrarily sharp (which is what starves the generator of useful gradient), and progressive growing avoids asking the generator to solve the hardest, highest-resolution version of the problem before it has learned coarse structure.