179 questions
No questions match those filters.
Walk me through how you'd take an AI product from an id...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansThe single biggest mistake in building an AI product is reaching for architecture before validating the idea — building a RAG pipeline and an agent framework for a task that a well-written prompt would have solved in an afternoon. The order that avoids this: pin down the problem and what “working” measurably means first, since without a metric defined upfront there’s no way to know later whether an added component actually helped. Then build the crudest possible proof of concept using nothing but prompt engineering against a handful of test cases — this either kills a bad idea in two days or gives you a real baseline number.
From there, build a golden set of 50–100 labeled examples before adding any complexity, because every subsequent decision should be justified by a measured improvement against that set, not by intuition. Add retrieval only if the model is missing knowledge it needs; add fine-tuning only if the failure mode is a persistent format or tone problem that better prompting can’t fix. Production hardening — guardrails, cost monitoring, human review paths, fallback behavior — comes last, once the underlying approach is proven to work at all.
A law firm’s contract-clause extractor went from a 78%-accuracy plain prompt to 84% with few-shot examples, 91% with RAG against the firm’s clause library, and 96% only after fine-tuning on 500 labeled examples — each layer added only because the previous one, measured, wasn’t enough on its own.