179 questions
No questions match those filters.
How do you evaluate Agentic RAG systems beyond standard...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansRAGAS-style metrics like faithfulness and context precision measure the quality of one retrieve-then-generate pass, but an agentic system makes a sequence of decisions, and those decisions need their own evaluation dimensions: whether it retrieved when it needed to and correctly skipped retrieval when it didn’t, how many steps it took to reach an answer relative to the minimum an expert would need, and whether triggering self-correction actually improved the outcome rather than making it worse. Building this requires a golden dataset of annotated trajectories, not just correct final answers, so each intermediate decision can be scored against what the right decision would have been.
The single most important metric in that set is what’s sometimes called failure honesty — when the system genuinely can’t answer a question, does it say so, or does it generate a confident, plausible-sounding wrong answer instead. A high faithfulness score on the questions it does answer says nothing about how often it silently fails on the questions it shouldn’t have answered at all, and that failure mode is the more dangerous one in production.