179 questions
No questions match those filters.
How do you evaluate an AI agent's performance across a...
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansAgent evaluation needs several dimensions scored independently rather than one pass/fail number, because success and process quality can diverge in either direction:
- Task success rate — did it actually complete the task correctly?
- Step efficiency — how many tool calls did it take relative to the minimum needed?
- Tool selection accuracy — did it pick the right tool at each step?
- Reasoning quality — were the intermediate thinking steps sound, independent of whether the final answer happened to be right?
- Latency and cost — total time and total tokens or API spend for the task.
- Error recovery — when something went wrong mid-task, did it self-correct?
A “find and summarize the top 3 AI papers this week” task might come back with a correct 3-for-3 result — full marks on task success — while having used five tool calls when three would have sufficed, putting step efficiency at a middling score. A single success/fail metric would call that task a clean win and miss the inefficiency entirely; scoring each dimension separately is what surfaces it. The practical value of this scorecard approach is catching the gap between an agent that’s technically correct and one that’s actually production-ready.