179 questions
No questions match those filters.
Can you have an agentic control loop with no LLM calls at all — and is there any point?
This is one of the questions in the full AI/ML interview bank. Pro unlocks all 1789 questions; Premium includes the same bank plus the highest daily Practice limit.
See plansYes — and usually there’s no advantage to calling it “agentic” unless something else in the loop is genuinely providing runtime judgment. Examples where it’s real: a search or planning algorithm exploring a state space, a rules engine whose rules are edited independently of the surrounding code, a reinforcement-learned policy, or a scheduler reacting to live capacity and failure signals. None of those need an LLM to be doing runtime interpretation rather than following a pre-authored script.
If the policy is simply a fixed set of deterministic rules, calling the loop “agentic” adds terminology without adding capability — a standard workflow implementation is clearer to build, test, and maintain, and calling it something fancier doesn’t change what it can do.
The honest position: reach for agentic architecture not because a control loop has branches, but because the thing selecting the next action needs to interpret something that wasn’t fully specified in advance. That’s true with or without an LLM in the loop.